Gretel: Gemma Arterton
Muriel: Famke Janssen
Mina: Pihla Viitala
Ben: Thomas Mann
Horned witch: Ingrid Bolsø Berdal
Edward: Derek Mears
Red-haired witch: Joanna Kulig
Sheriff Berringer: Peter Stromare
Paramount Pictures and Metro-Goldwyn-Meyer
Pictures present a film written and directed by Tommy Wirkola. Running time: 88
min. Rated R (for strong fantasy horror violence and gore, brief
sexuality/nudity and language).
Ever since I first saw
“Hansel & Gretel: Witch Hunters” advertised, I haven’t been able get
that Bugs Bunny short out of my head; the one where he tells the prince that
he’s reading the story of “Hansel and Gretel”, and the prince walks away asking, “Hansel? Hansel?” flabbergasted by the pronunciation of the name as “Hahnsel.”
It seemed to me that was going to be a more worthwhile memory than this movie.
It is, but the movie wasn’t as bad as I thought it would be. Unfortunately, it
also isn’t as good as it could’ve been.
When you see as many movies
as I do, you begin to notice things that might slip by the casual viewer. Two
of the names in the film’s opening credits struck me as interesting. Will
Ferrell and Adam McKay are listed as executive producers. Most people know who
Ferrell is. Adam McKay is his long time creative partner. The two created the
website Funny or Die.com. They’re the creators behind such comedy hits as
“Anchorman: The Legend of Ron Burgundy”, “Talladega Nights: The Ballad of Ricky
Bobby”, and “Step Brothers.” Ferrell stars in them and McKay directs them. A
costumed update of the Hansel and Gretel fairy tales with action and special
effects all in 3D might not seem like something that would be up their ally. So
after seeing their names I thought, this might be a funnier take than I had
realized.
The premise looked pretty
ridiculous in the trailers. After surviving their ordeal in the woods with the
witch who tried to cook them, Hansel and Gretel grow up to become badass witch hunters.
Sporting crossbows and shotguns and smokin’ hot leather outfits, the two hire
out their services to towns in need of burning some witches. There’s a lot of
“ooos” and “ahs”, and things blow up real good, and people say things like,
“Whoa. I didn’t see that coming,” and “You’ve got to be kidding me,” as some
computer generated effect rises up in front of them. But perhaps Ferrell and
McKay recognized a tongue-in-cheek aspect to the script that attracted them to
it.
Then I realized that
writer/director Tommy Wirkola was the man responsible for the clever tongue-in-check
horror flick “Dead Snow” in which a group of vacationing med students find
themselves trapped in a cabin in the woods surrounded by Nazi soldier zombies
from World War II. Along with being a fairly good zombie flick, the movie was
well aware of its preposterous premise and had a good deal of fun playing with
the genre’s clichés. Would that be the case with “Hansel & Gretel” as well?
The truth is there is a
degree of comedy present in the delivery of this silly tale. There just isn’t
enough. The introductory passages have a more snarky attitude to them than the
rest of the picture. Once everything has been established, the movie falls into
a pretty predictable pattern of violence, action, gore, gore, big special
effect, gore, snarky quip. Wirkola’s screenplay uses modern explicit
expressions to contrast with the period costume setting to cull much of the
comedy from the preposterous plot. While this works fairly well at first, by
the end of the film he’s pretty much played out his use of the “F” word.
The whole script could’ve
benefitted from a more clever use of language. Consider the opening sequence,
which recounts the original fairy tale. The entire sequence is done with
minimal dialogue. It sets up all the parts you know about the tale. The kids
are out in the woods alone. They come across a candy house. They eat some
candy. There’s a witch inside. She captures them. They fight back and throw her
in the stove to burn. This sums up the approach on the whole film. They show
you the situation. Hansel and Gretel react. There’s no style or panache to the
screenplay. The entire sequence is designed to highlight the great production
design, when it could’ve established a repartee for the heroes and an
irreverent approach toward the witchcraft.
The production design and
special effects are the most impressive part of the franchise. Combined with
well-produced action sequences, these elements save the movie from descending
into pure drivel. The witches’ lairs are artfully creepy. The troll, Edward, is
an interesting creature creation. His appearance is somewhere in between the
classic creature effects produced by Jim Henson’s creature shop for 80s fantasy
films and the creative CGI creations of today’s best fantasy films. I liked
that the witches’ brooms were really just craggy forest branches. The design
team had a good deal of fun coming up with various witch designs as well.
No comments:
Post a Comment