Showing posts with label essay. Show all posts
Showing posts with label essay. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 13, 2016

Favorites of 2015


The time has come for yet another list from yet another fan of cinema. I do this every year and hope it does some of my readers good. By this time most people have already gotten their lists out. As such there is sometimes little new to be found in my contribution. Still, it was a rough year for the blog and most of these movies never got a review when I originally saw them. In fact, I believe this will be the first opinions of all but two of these films to be posted on my site at all.

As is usually the case, because of my limited resources being a blogger outside the Hollywood industry, I did not get to see all the movies I would’ve liked to consider for this list. Most notably missing are Todd Haynes’ “Carol” and Charlie Kaufman’s stop motion “Anomolisa”. I hope to see them before the Oscars are awarded in a little over a month.

That being said, I was able to see a greater amount of the contenders than normal this year despite the fact that I viewed far less movies than I usually do in a year. Thanks to a much greater availability of platforms than ever before, I was able to cull out most of the titles I felt I needed to see to compile this list and the result is that I found it very difficult to cut down my favorites, or even to put them in any sort of order. I’ve never had such a tight and interchangeable list of favorites before. I decided not to limit my list and have listed every four-star review I awarded this year. I have tried to place them in an order of very favorite to slightly less favorite. There are sections of this list that I could endlessly rearrange if I didn’t just force myself to post it. The margin of difference between the first film on the list and the last film is so narrow it hardly matters.

Monday, April 06, 2015

Penny Thoughts ‘15—Moneyball (2011) ****


PG-13, 133 min.
Director: Bennett Miller
Writers: Steven Zaillian, Aaron Sorkin, Stan Chervin, Michael Lewis (book “Moneyball: The Art of Winning an Unfair Game”)
Starring: Brad Pitt, Jonah Hill, Philip Seymour Hoffman, Robin Wright, Chris Pratt, Stephen Bishop, Reed Diamond, Brent Jennings, Ken Medlock, Tammy Blanchard, Jack McGee, Vyto Ruginis, Nick Searcy, Glenn Morshower, Casey Bond, Nick Porrazzo, Kerris Dorsey, Arliss Howard, Reed Thompson, Spike Jonze

The 2015 regular season of Major League Baseball began today. There was a time when I never would’ve known it was the first day of baseball. I wish I still did not. I hate baseball. I hated it when I played it as a child. My parents made me play. Despite my hatred of it, that was probably the right thing for them to do. It did help build my character. They only made me play for so long and once I was a certain age they let me decide. The last year I played was the first year my age group did our own pitching; and the coach wisely chose me to be a pitcher. For the first time ever I actually enjoyed playing the game. No more left field. But sure enough, when I had a choice the next year, I didn’t even flinch when my parents asked if I wanted to play again. Nope! I was done with baseball.

Thursday, March 05, 2015

Penny Thoughts ‘15—Dazed & Confused (1993) ****


R, 102 min.
Director/Writer: Richard Linklater
Starring: Jason London, Joey Lauren Adams, Milla Jovovich, Shawn Andrews, Rory Cochrane, Adam Goldberg, Anthony Rapp, Sasha Jenson, Marissa Ribisi, Deena Martin, Michelle Bruke, Cole Hauser, Christine Harnos, Wiley Wiggins, Mark Vandermuelen, Esteban Powell, Jeremy Fox, Ben Affleck, Jason O. Smith, Christin Hinojosa, Parker Posey, Matthew McConaughey, Catherine Morris, Nicky Katt, Parker Brooks, Rick Moser, Terry Mross, Richard Dillard, Fred Lerner, David Blackwell

I recently decided to start a vinyl record collection. It all came about from an article (that has since been lost in the vastness of the web) about collecting music. I was an avid music collector throughout high school and college. I collected cassettes and then reluctantly moved on to CDs as they were beginning to change the music soundscape. I remember the debates about analog and digital recording and mastering. Who remembers when CDs would sport a letter code of three letters consisting of ‘A’ and ‘D’ to distinguish which part of the production process was done analog or digitally? ADD, or DDD or different variations of such.

Friday, November 28, 2014

Penny Thoughts ‘14—Jurassic World trailer & Star Wars: The Force Awakens trailer


The first time I met Roger Ebert I totally embarrassed myself by criticizing one of his colleagues, long time Today Show film critic Gene Shalit. I took a light-hearted shot at Shalit, suggesting that I could do his job, not realizing that Shalit was an alumnus of The University of Illinois along with Ebert. Ebert gently defended his friend and colleague without really demeaning my opinion.

I never really liked Shalit’s shtick of clever wordplay in his reviews. He never really seemed to get to the meat of the movies that way. Of course, his very short form television format hardly afforded him any depth to begin with. But it really ticked me off when instead of reviewing a new movie one week he reviewed the first trailer of the first Harry Potter movie. This was the week before I met Ebert, so it was fresh in my head. How insulting to the filmmakers who did have releases that week that their chances of promotion would be preempted by a review of a trailer.

That being said, the were two very high profile trailer releases this week, that I’ve decided not to let go by without dedicating one of my Penny Thoughts columns to them. The second was such a big deal that people might have already forgotten about the first.

In case you missed it, the beginning of this Thanksgiving week brought us the premiere of the first “Jurassic World” trailer. The fourth “Jurassic Park” movie has been in the oven so long, I figured the studio would eventually throw it out, or if they did finally make it, it would be burned to a crisp. Well, They did make it, and I was surprised to find that it actually looks pretty good.

Saturday, March 01, 2014

Oscar Predictions 2014


I find myself in a predicament this Oscar season that I haven’t been in since college. I’ve seen very few of this year’s nominees. Especially over the past couple of years, I’ve had great luck in getting to see most of the nominees either in theaters or through screeners or other avenues, and so I’ve gone into the Oscars with a pretty good familiarity of all the material involved. Somehow, I just wasn’t able to get to see many of the nominated films this year.

I considered dropping my Oscar predictions piece this year because of this. For many years I didn’t even bother to make my predictions public. I feared my opinions on the films would affect my predictions too much. In order to compensate for my strong opinions, I settled on the format of “who will win” vs. “who should win.” I was very satisfied with presenting my predictions in this way, because it allowed me to let people know which of those award winners weren’t necessarily well deserved and steer people toward the films I felt were better when my opinions differed from the Academy’s.

The truth is, however, you hardly have to see the movies to see the trends in the awards season. Since the Oscars are generally the final set of awards to be passed out for each movie release year, the winners are usually pretty predictable. Despite the fact that many critics are calling this Oscar season the most wide-open field in a while, I think that’s an effort to keep enthusiasm up for a field of contenders that few people have had the chance to see. I don’t think this year’s race is any harder to predict than most years. I will forgo the “what should win” feature, since I hardly know this year. I don’t expect much in terms of surprises this year, as usual.

Thursday, January 16, 2014

Best Movies of 2013


Honestly, 2013 wasn’t a very good year in movies. That’s a phrase I’ve been trying to avoid in the intros to my Best of the Year lists for quite some time. For the past couple of years, the notion hasn’t even crossed my mind. We’ve been lucky to experience several great cinematic years of late. It had to turn around some time. For the first time in a while I was worried that I wouldn’t even see enough great movies to make a list.

Now, that doesn’t diminish any of the films that are on this list. When the movies were great this year, they were really great, including one of the greatest films I’ve ever seen. A slim year like this one also helps to diversify the list a little more than usual. When a year is filled with great films, many of the films seen on other lists are often repeated right here in The Well, with only a few stray bullets. This year I think I’ve got something from just about every genre and style out there, and very few that made other people’s lists.

Of course, another reason why this year was kind of slim on best of entries for me was that I had a hell of a time getting to the movies in this second half of the year. Some family emergencies kept from a few of the big award contenders, plus availability has been a problem for me this year. Living out in the middle of nowhere in the Midwest has kept some of the more controversial contenders from coming anywhere close to me.

Wednesday, December 11, 2013

The Web is Alive with a Difference of Opinion


Ever since NBC broadcast its grand experiment “The Sound of Music Live”, the Internet has been abuzz with both the naysayers and those who have embraced the production as a new holiday monument. It is the most polarizing TV event I can remember in recent years. Initially, I had no plans to cover it on this blog, but when I found myself catching about half of it during the live broadcast and with the strong immediate reaction audiences were having toward it, I felt I had to weigh in, for my own sake if no one else’s.

Since I posted my negative review, which did not pull punches about my opinion on Carrie Underwood’s performance as the iconic character of Maria Von Trapp, I’ve seen a great many of my friends post reproaches against the negative reception of Underwood. One particular post that was written by one of the many who took to Twitter to bash Underwood live during the broadcast contained an about face of her negative views of the production and compared the critical hazing of Underwood to cyber bullying.

Wednesday, November 13, 2013

Why Many Critics Should Stop Writing


I often wonder to myself, just why do I do this? What’s the point of critiquing movies in an age when everybody and their great uncle has a blog about movies, in an age when the printed word is dying, in an age when the opinion becomes less and less pertinent as everyone feels free to offer theirs and listen to no one’s through the wonderful world of the internet. I don’t even get paid for this. I offer my time and my intellectual assets with no compensation. Why do I bother? Well, you’ve got to fight for something.

I read an article on OMG! of Yahoo! about Justin Timberlake’s recent article in GQ after being chosen as one of their Men of the Year. Timberlake gets rather harsh in the article about the critical bashing his acting career took after the disappointing box office for his recent film “Runner, Runner”. He’s mad and he’s not going to take it anymore. What he’s mad about gets to the heart of why I continue to fight the criticism machine that has become the hateful face of film criticism in the comment section age.

OMG! contributor Taryn Ryder speculates that what inspired Timberlake’s question of whether he should just quit acting because a film flops in the GQ article is due to another article that ran in Variety at about the time of the “Runner, Runner” release. The name of the article, written by the magazine’s film editor Ramin Setoodeh, is “Why Justin Timberlake Should Stop Acting”. Really? Is this what even professional film criticism has come to? True, the article isn’t a critical review, but an op-ed piece; and yet, there is a level of professionalism that has escaped the film criticism world here.

Friday, September 06, 2013

The New Social Cinema


I don’t know. I’m having some sort of convergence of ideas or something. I don’t know if it’s all very profound or not. Perhaps not, but a series of coincidences seem to keep me on a particular subject matter this week—that strange urge to consume what we already know.

It’s really been a while since I watched a lot of movies with which I’m already familiar. But this past week, I’ve just flooded my head with a bunch of movies I want to see again. I started pursuing this urge last weekend when I took in two Clint Eastwood movies (and almost a third) and then I moved on to “Rocky”. I also watched a very particular genre movie this week, which is so particular each and every entry is pretty much the same. I decided not to watch a couple of other movies in that genre that I was familiar with, but I might be moving into them this weekend.

Tuesday, April 23, 2013

Ebertfest 2013: A Review of the 15th Annual Roger Ebert’s Film Festival


The Golden Thumb is Awarded to all special guests of Ebertfest.

There is no doubt that this year’s Roger Ebert’s Film Festival at the historic Virginia Theater in Champaign, Ill. was a sad event. The famed film critic’s death on April 4 of this year meant the 15th annual holding of this event last week, known to those who attend as Ebertfest, was only the second that Ebert was unable to attend and the first without his presence at all.

I’m going to stop myself right there, though, for I feel I’ve made an all too common mistake by journalists these days. I got my facts wrong. I have no doubt that Roger’s presence was felt beyond bounds at this year’s Ebertfest. At this point, he must be referred to as Roger in reference to this event in particular because all who attend it are friends of the man. It has been a place where one cineaste shares 12 to 14 of his favorite movies with 2000 of his friends. This year, I think Roger’s own personal stake in each film was clearer than ever.

Thursday, April 04, 2013

Roger and Me


In 1989, a then unknown documentary filmmaker named Michael Moore released his first film about his attempts to sit down and have a conversation with then GM CEO Roger Smith about his decision radically downsize the auto manufacturing company’s Flint, Michigan plant in Moore’s hometown. Moore’s earnest style and his signature of breaking the documentarian’s rule of placing himself into the facts of the subject matter marked the birth of a new major filmmaker. As a teenager growing up in Topsham, Maine at the time, it might’ve seemed unlikely that I would care about such a film let alone even know about it. But I did. The reason I did is because of another man named Roger.

Roger Ebert is universally thought of as the pioneer of modern film criticism. Without his efforts it is unlikely a seventeen year old in Topsham, Maine would ever have sought out a documentary about the economic downturn of a Michigan city that he’d never heard of. I hadn’t yet fully developed the obsession with film that Ebert had a very large part in cultivating, but I did watch “Siskel & Ebert & The Movies” almost every Saturday morning to find out what was opening and if it was any good or not.

Saturday, February 23, 2013

Oscar Predictions 2013


Chicago Sun Times film critic Roger Ebert claims that this year is one of the easiest years to predict the outcome of the Oscars being presented Sunday night by the Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences. When the nominees were announced a month and a half ago, it seemed one of the least predictable batch of nominees in years. However, as usual the last month of near weekly awards presentations for the finest work in film over the past year has brought a good deal of focus to the Oscars picture. I don’t agree that it is one of the easiest years to predict. I can remember one a couple of years ago that Ebert claimed was one of the hardest and a record number of people out guessed him in his annual Outguess Ebert’s Oscar Picks contest.

The last few years, I have been very consistent in predicting between 17 to 20 out of 24 awards correctly, with most of my misses coming in the very obscure categories. I’m not so confident this year. I think I’ll be doing very well at 17. It wouldn’t surprise me if I don’t do that well this year.

The main reason this is such a tough year to predict is because such a wide variety of great movies reached such a great amount of audiences. It has been a while since the collection of Best Picture nominees have been seen so widely consumed by the public as they have this year. It’s been longer since that collection of films was also such a consistently high quality. “Beasts of the Southern Wild” and “Amour” are the only two films that didn’t see a wide national release and didn’t receive good to impressive box office numbers, although for the specialty market audience they played to, they had very impressive numbers. Only one film strikes me as one that doesn’t belong in terms of filmmaking quality, but it appealed to a wide variety of audiences and I understand why.

Friday, January 11, 2013

Oscar Retains the Ability to Surprise


Oscar nominations were announced early Thursday morning, Jan. 10th, 2013 for the 2012 release year. After several years of fairly predictable nominations from the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences for their annual awards ceremony and equally predictable winners, it seems this is the year for the Oscars to surprise us once again.

In what was generally thought of as an excellent year for Hollywood born movies, it shouldn’t come as a surprise that such a broad field of candidates should yield the most surprising batch of nominees in recent years. Lead by Steven Spielberg’s historical epic “Lincoln” with 12 nominations, this year’s candidates are some of the most diverse movies to be nominated in the history of the awards.

Friday, July 20, 2012

The Dark Mourning


In light of this morning’s tragic events in Aurora, Colorado, A Penny in the Well will not be posting a review today. I do, however, offer some commentary on what happened.

I attended a midnight screening of “The Dark Knight Rises” last night, as record numbers did across the nation today. I woke this morning after four hours of sleep because of my late night activity to learn of the horrors that occurred at the Century 16 in Aurora. It was a jolt that brought me immediately back to the Columbine massacre that occurred 13 years ago. At that time, I was living in Colorado and working as a manager of a movie theater. There are almost too many coincidental connections there for me process it.

Saturday, April 21, 2012

Ebertfest 2012 Preview


Another year has rolled around and once again it’s time for Ebertfest. The 14th Annual Roger Ebert’s Film Festival plays at the Virginia Theater in Champaign-Urbana, Illinois next week April 25-29. I’ve attended five of them over the years and hope beyond my financial considerations each year that I might attend again. Alas this is another year that I won’t be in attendance, but as the programming for this film festival is probably the best a cineaste can ask for, I will be doing my best to keep up with the movies as they watch them in the Virginia Theater next weekend.

Wednesday, January 25, 2012

Oscar Nomination Toss Up


The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences announced their annual awards nominations Tuesday, January 24, 2012 in a live ceremony at 7:30 a.m. CST. I don’t always write about my thoughts on the Oscar nominations or offer up predictions. I do this year because it’s an especially exciting year for the Oscars. That’s because other than just a couple of the big categories, this year is a difficult year to predict due to the overwhelming excellence to be found amongst the contenders.

Many of my predictions here will be tentative as I have yet to see all of this year’s contenders. The fact that the frontrunner for many of the top awards, “The Artist”, is probably still a ways away from a wide enough release to allow me to see it will greatly hinder my perceptions of just how the Oscars should play out, but not so much on how it actually will. The surprise nominations will also present a challenge for me, as they include several films that I’ve yet to see. Regardless, I will do my best to see clearly what these nominations mean and whom they might be going to on Oscar night.

Before I get into my analysis of the nominations, however, I’d like to address an ongoing debate that seems to come up every year. Do the Oscars really honor the best the film industry has to offer? There is much debate as to whether these award ceremonies are actually dedicated to honoring artistic excellence, or are they just propaganda to the capitalist machine that runs the entertainment industry?

Sunday, January 01, 2012

The Evolution of the Penny Thought



Well, it’s a new year, and therefore a time of change. The grand experiment that is the “Penny Thought” began two years ago. I had just come off a difficult year for me when I wasn’t able to get to the cinema nearly as much as I would’ve liked. My weekly reviews were sporadic at best, and several times throughout the year, I had gone two weeks or more without a post. The visitations to my site were suffering. I had to do something to increase my readership.

Thursday, September 23, 2010

The Summer of Three

Photo by Andrew D. Wells

The “Law of Three” is folklore that claims bad things come in threes. Every time I hear about a celebrity dying it seems I hear about this Law of Three. It’s pretty easy to evoke the Law of Three when a celebrity dies because like all human beings, celebrities are mortal. Whenever one dies, you simply cite the last two who died before that one, and you’ve got your three.

Sometimes it’s a little easier to believe in the Law of Three. As a cineaste in Marshall, there were three bad things that occurred this summer. First, we lost our video rental store. It was a Movie Gallery, which has closed stores all over the country over the past few years. As a long time Netflix member, this did not really affect me all that much; however, my membership certainly didn’t help keep the local video store open. Second, August saw the final episode of the long running syndicated movie criticism show “At the Movies”. No longer could I learn the opinions of a couple of top critics in a format the provided these opinions in the form of a heated discussion. Third, and probably most devastating, was the closing of our local cinema.

Those aren’t the three I really want to talk about, however. No, the three I wanted to address were not bad things, but rather quite enjoyable ones. The three that concern me today are the three-star reviews I handed out just about every week over this summer movie season. It became a bit of a joke by the last few weeks of the summer blockbuster season. “Let me guess, you gave it three stars?”  a friend of mine said more than once.

Now, not every movie I reviewed received three stars. There were some exceptional movies this summer. The uber-popular “Inception”, the retro action flick “Salt” and underrated spoof “MacGruber” all received coveted four star ratings from this critic. There were also a few duds, including Ridley Scott’s disappointing version of “Robin Hood”, the uninspired comic book western “Jonah Hex”, and the depressingly awful “The Expendables”. But for a summer when I spent more time in front of the big screen than ever before, there was surprisingly little divergence from basic popcorn enjoyment.

As a critic, when you get on a streak of similarly ranked movies, it begins to worry one about questions of credibility. I can imagine readers rolling their eyes at yet another three star review. Especially when some of those reviews were pretty far off the general consensus of what most considered failures. Some might think that continuing to reward questionable films with three stars was just laziness on my part. But it wasn’t easy to say that I liked “The A-Team”, “The Last Airbender”, and “Knight and Day” when everyone else in the critical world was recommending people should avoid these movies like the plague. The truth is I enjoyed them, and I didn’t feel it was right for me to pretend otherwise just because no one else did.

In fact, this summer was one of the most enjoyable summers I can remember spending at the movies. Perhaps that’s a reflection on our times. Perhaps it just felt good to get away from the burdens of our current political and financial environments. Perhaps it was a way to return to simpler, easier times for me.

There have been a lot of retro trends in film recently. “Toy Story 3” was a return to a franchise that last bowed on the silver screen over a decade ago. “Predators” picked up from where the franchise was twenty years ago, before they started hunting Aliens. “Piranha 3D” added to a film series that hadn’t reared its head in almost 30 years. And the whole 3D phenomenon harkens back to the early eighties and even further back than that.

There has been little produced by Hollywood this year so far that I would really jump up and down about. It seems most of this year’s best movies are being imported from other countries. Australia’s noir “The Square”, the Swedish hit “The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo”, France’s Academy Award entry “A Prophet”, and Korea’s “Mother” are the best movies I’ve seen this year.

I’ve had a good time at the movies this year. I can’t knock that. Oh, and as far as the Law of Three goes… well, it seems to go both ways. A local family is supposed to be opening a new movie rental store, another local family will re-open the Marshall Cinema on October 22, and Roger Ebert announced his resurrected “At the Movies” will begin airing in January.

Sunday, August 09, 2009

“No More Yankie My Wankie”: In Memory of John Hughes 1950-2009


As a film buff, I often dread the deaths of certain filmmakers. The thought of never seeing another movie by Eastwood, Scorsese, or Spielberg is a disheartening one. One filmmaker I had never thought of in that way was John Hughes. In fact, Hughes hadn’t directed a movie since 1991. But when his sudden death was announced, I found myself both nostalgic for his high school comedies that permeated my own high school experience and saddened that we had lost an artist who so accurately portrayed the psyche of a generation.

On Thursday, August 6, 2009, filmmaker John Hughes died from a heart attack suffered on his morning walk in Manhattan. He was 59. Hughes had been a staple of the Cineplex during the eighties and early nineties. He started out as a writer for National Lampoon magazine. The movies that sprung from the comedy publication gave Hughes his first screenplay success. While his debut screenplay for “Class Reunion” (1982) didn’t enjoy the success of the earlier National Lampoon film “Animal House” (1978), it got Hughes on his way toward building a reputation as one of Hollywood’s premiere comedy screenplay writers.

Hughes’ first big success came with the screenplay for the Michael Keaton vehicle “Mr. Mom” (1983). Once his third screenplay was filmed, Hughes shot into the stratosphere of ‘80s comedy. “National Lampoon’s Vacation”(1983) became a national phenomenon, coming at the beginning of both the public acceptance of paid cable channels and the birth of the home video market. Within a few years of its release the family vacation comedy became loved by audiences of all ages despite its ‘R’ rating.

Hughes made his directorial debut in 1984 with “Sixteen Candles”, another family-oriented movie that pushed the bounds of good taste while perfectly capturing the alienation of adolescence. Stamped with the an inexplicable ‘PG’ rating, which allowed for the profane humor to reach a larger audience, “Sixteen Candles” kicked off a quick succession of high school-based movies that would help to define a generation and usher in a whole new era of filmmaking. Hughes followed up with a teen comedy or drama in quick succession including, “The Breakfast Club”(1985), “Weird Science”(1985), “Pretty In Pink”(screenplay only 1986), “Ferris Beuller’s Day Off”(1986), and “Some Kind of Wonderful”(screenplay only 1987), often utilizing the stars of “Candles”, Molly Ringwald and Anthony Michael Hall, and always depicting awkward teenagers flying in the face of authority and defying the class-oriented structures of their environments.

In 1987 Hughes directed his first grown up-themed movie “Planes, Trains & Automobiles”. Centered on a family holiday—Thanksgiving—the movie followed a man’s (Steve Martin) failing attempts to get home to his family during the busy travel holiday. He continued in the adult vein for his next project “She’s Having a Baby”(1988), about the loss of identity a man (Kevin Bacon) feels as he attempts to start his own family. He returned to family-based movies with his next two directorial efforts “Uncle Buck”(1989) and “Curly Sue”(1991), which focus on the unanticipated relationships adults can share with children.

“Curly Sue” would be Hughes’ final trip to the director’s chair, but he continued to pen a number of family films, including National Lampoon’s “European Vacation”(1985) and “Christmas Vacation”(1989), “The Great Outdoors”(1988), “Home Alone”(1990) and two sequels, “Dutch”(1991), “Career Opportunities”(1991), “Beethoven”(1992), “Dennis the Menace”(1993), the remake of “Miracle on 34th Street”(1994), “Baby’s Day Out”(1994), “101 Dalmatians”(1996), “Flubber”(1997), “Reach the Rock”(1998), and “Just Visiting”(2001).

Hughes was not a flashy director, but his writing skills helped him get into the mindset of the American high school teenager in a way that no other writer-director ever had before. Aside from a few contributions by a handful of other directors, Hughes essentially created the high school genre, one that to this day produces a new picture every couple of months. For the first time, Hughes ushered audiences inside the psyche of high school aged kids, and he took them seriously. Even in his most raucous comedies, his teenagers were intellectual and striving beyond the positions that had been predetermined for them.

He always had a great depth to his cast of characters. They were kids that really existed in American high schools. For the first time teenagers recognized themselves represented in film. As Hughes matured as a filmmaker, so did his characters. What were at first essentially plots constructed to provide shocking laughs provided by the imagination of his teens, eventually evolved into studies in how adults tried without success to control these kids as cattle, and then into examinations of the class systems that formed in high school society. His direction got more inventive as he moved into his adult fare, but he seemed most at home with his teenage characters.

Hughes also introduced the world to a new generation of actors. They became known as the Brat Pack; although, I imagine this categorization must have frustrated Hughes. He was trying to tell adults that these kids weren’t brats, but intelligent thinking people just trying to survive a period in their lives that most adults had lost touch with. Many of his stars never survived this inaccurate label. Molly Ringwald, Alley Sheedy, Anthony Michael Hall, Andrew McCarthy, Judd Nelson, Lea Thompson, Eric Stoltz and others shared well over fifteen minutes of fame, but never seemed to outlive their ‘80s personas. Others, like John Cusack, Matthew Broderick, Emilio Estevez, Charlie Sheen, Joan Cusack, and Bill Paxton became major stars. Hughes also showed a knack for creating the perfect vehicles for well-established performers such as, Steve Martin, Chevy Chase, John Candy, Walter Mathau, Glenn Close, Catherine O’Hara, Dan Aykroyd, Paul Dooley, and Charles Grodin.

A contribution that Hughes had a hand in was the development of the soundtrack album as a moneymaking enterprise of its own. While George Lucas and Martin Scosese blazed the trail of incorporating pop songs into the structure of a film, Hughes is in a small part responsible for making the soundtrack album more marketable. Although the studio executives probably would have driven the market on their own anyway, Hughes touched the ever-important teen market with his ability to include underground bands on his soundtrack that spoke to the counter culture leanings of teens. Hughes introduced audiences to the likes of The Smiths, Orchestral Maneuvers in the Dark, The Psychedelic Furs, Simple Minds, Everything But the Girl, Kate Bush, The Jesus and Mary Chain, Stevie Ray Vaughn, Suzanne Vega, Echo & the Bunnymen, New Order, and INXS. Suddenly teens were exploring music beyond the American Top 40 charts. Soon bands would be making more money by contributing tracks to a film soundtrack album than they might from their own album sales.

Following the announcement of Hughes’ death, my home page on Facebook was aflutter with quotes from his movies. High school friends and college friends all had their favorite quotations. Quoting “The Breakfast Club”, one friend in particular noted that nobody had ever summed up his high school experience better, “You see us as you want to see us - in the simplest terms, in the most convenient definitions. You see us as a brain, an athlete, a basket case, a princess and a criminal. Correct? That's the way we saw each other at 7:00 this morning. We were brainwashed.” Thank you for opening our eyes. R.I.P. John Hughes.

Wednesday, July 29, 2009

Music: Food for the Movie Soul

A long time ago, in a state far far away I was a high school kid still developing my obsessive nature for film. In fact, in high school my movie obsession was probably fairly normal. It didn’t go much beyond seeing “Bill and Ted’s Excellent Adventure” on opening weekend, or renting that strange “Blue Velvet” thing with Dennis Hopper that all my friends had been hearing about.

No, my obsession at that time was with music. I had always had something that consumed me as I grew up. First there were Legos, then Dungeons & Dragons, Garbage Pail Kids, and G.I. Joe—but as adulthood loomed a deeper investment into something more profound and personal became necessary. Pushed along by my best friend at the time and the opening of an independent music store, I grabbed onto music as an outcry of the soul.

Really the roots of my music obsession began in grade school, when that same friend and I would throw in a song on his boombox—“a boombox is a powerful thing”—lie down and visualize some form of story to go along with the music. I remember I had trouble separating the movie in my mind for Billy Joel’s “Pressure” from the video that was in heavy rotation on MTV at the time, but Journey’s “Lights” was something wholly original in my mind. After a song had ended the two of us would relate the stories we each envisioned to each other.

Later, after we had already developed our music obsessions into something above and beyond the average teenager’s tastes, we would get together with two other friends as equally ensconced in their music obsessions as the two of us and combine our CD collections into a giant mass of music collage. We developed an intricate system to randomly select which albums would be thrown into a multi-disc player set to shuffle and spend from dusk to dawn playing pool, philosophizing, and commencing with our early discussions on film, while listening to the tunes that inspired us.

In college, I finally started to develop my deep-rooted obsession with film as I studied to be a professional actor. Surround by other actors who recast “The Godfather” as it would’ve been with the Hofstra Drama Department—the honor of Concigliore Tom Hagen was bestowed upon me—my full passion for movies could no longer be denied. But even with the new fascination, I found my music mania flourishing due to the school’s close proximity to a Tower Records.

With a subscription to CMJ (College Music Journal), I soon discovered bands considered obscure by the average music consumer—Bark Psychosis, Codine, Red Red Meat, Julian Cope. I gained a reputation on campus as a music guru. If somebody wanted to know when a new album would be released, they came to me. If someone needed a mix tape of new and fresh music rather than the same old pop tunes, they came to me. The editor of one of the student magazines asked me to review REM’s “Automatic for the People” because he knew I would have it well listened to before anyone else.

The advent of DVD changed the way everyone consumed movies, especially the film buff. It also drastically altered my own consumption of music. My free time shifted to watching more movies. Building my movie collection became my primary fixation and music took a back seat. As I began to know more movies, I became fonder of movie scores, less reliant on popular music, and to a degree less in touch with my own emotions. I no longer sought music for my own emotional outlet, but as in a movie, music became a background element in my life.

Recently, I’ve rediscovered my passion for music. In a way, I feel I lost a decade of my life by failing to pursue my music interests. However, the hard times that a recession brings also will force us to return to comforts of the past. Throughout, what has become an extremely busy summer I’ve eased back to some degree on my movie watching and greatly increased the amount of music I listen to.

My passion for film is just as strong as ever, but it is once again matched by my enthusiasm for music. And once again I feel the connection between the two. Both embody fantasy, but the music can be much more personal than the movies, something I can make my own as well as admire.

The other day, as I sat outside the Lyceum Theater in Arrow Rock, calming myself prior to a performance. I listened to the sad and seductive voice of Margo Timmins of the Cowboy Junkies. She told a story with her lyrics and I pictured it, once again forming a movie in my mind to go along with the song. It was sad and tragic, but it filled me with joy.

You said never to grow old,
But you forgot to tell me how.
You said never to grow old,
And then you sank your teeth into those final feet.

Cowboy Junkies, “Those Final Feet”