Director: Roland Emmerich
Writer: John Orloff
Starring: Rhys Ifans,
Vanessa Redgrave, Samuel Armesto, Rafe Spall, David Thewlis, Edward Hogg,
Xavier Samuel, Sam Reid, Jamie Campbell Bower, Joely Richardson, Paolo de Vita,
Trystan Gravelle
The plays of William
Shakespeare are the most reproduced plays in cinema. They don’t do great box
office, but they are a fascination for the people who make movies. Even
fictions based on the life of Shakespeare tend to bring passionate filmmaking
about.
It was a shock to many when
epic disaster filmmaker Roland Emmerich decided that a movie about the plays of
Shakespeare would be his first film since declaring he was done with disaster
flicks like “Independence Day”, “The Day After Tomorrow” and “2012”. He had
previously directed “The Patriot” with Mel Gibson playing a Revolutionary War
hero, so the period picture was not unknown to the director. Nor was re-writing
history, as it has been reported that many of the “facts” of that film were
severely stretched.
What was more of a shock to
me was that noted Shakespearean actor Derek Jacobi would portray the narrator
of this re-imaganing of British history and Shakespeare’s place in it. But,
what a rendering it is. Like “Shakespeare in Love”, it has all the intrigue and
theatrics of Shakespeare’s writing. That film was structured like one of his
romances, this one like one of his historical tragedies.
This film imagines that
Shakespeare wasn’t the author of his plays at all, but rather they were the
product of a noble who was trying to shape the future of England in the final
days of Queen Elizabeth’s rule. Rhys Ifans plays Edward, the Earl of Oxford,
the true author of the plays, in a performance that I might’ve predicted would
earn him an Oscar nomination had they not already been awarded. He hires
playwright Ben Johnson (Samuel Armesto) to take credit for them, but the man
who will become England’s most popular playwright after Elizabeth’s rule does
not want to take credit for another’s work. The actor Will Shakespeare (Rafe
Spall) has no such qualms.
Edward wishes to use the
will of the people to undermine Elizabeth’s closest advisors, the Cecils, in
their bid to name James II of Scotland her successor. He fills his plays with
allusions to the current politics of the country, most notably the
oft-questioned choice to make Richard III a hunchback in Shakespeare’s play.
Robert Cecil was a hunchback and much reviled by the public.
No comments:
Post a Comment