Director: Mike Nichols
Writer: Kevin Wade
Starring: Melanie Griffith,
Harrison Ford, Sigourney Weaver, Alec Baldwin, Joan Cusack, Philip Bosco, Nora
Dunn
I know the hair was bad in
the ‘80s, however, aren’t Melanie Griffith’s and Joan Cusack’s hair a little
much in this movie. During the opening scenes of “Working Girl”, as the camera
follows them on their commute to Manhattan from Staten Island, it’s hard not to
chuckle at their plumes. However, I didn’t notice any of the background extras
sporting anything like the coifs of these main players. Perhaps, the filmmakers
insisted the extras tone down their normal do’s in order not to pull focus from
Griffith and Cusack.
Despite its opening scenes,
Mike Nichols’s “Working Girl” isn’t about hairstyle. It is, however, an
important point in the women’s liberation movement in the workforce. “Working
Girl” was one of the first workplace movies featuring women as the power
players. Even Harrison Ford is subservient to the two leading ladies. Although,
he is a power broker in their company, he plays second fiddle to their ideas.
This was very important because, not only was Ford one hunk of a man for the
ladies, he was also the biggest box office draw in Hollywood and would be for
almost another ten years. His involvement gave the movie a good deal of
attention its subject matter normally wouldn’t have.
Sigourney Weaver was also on
a hot streak at the time, having become one of the first women with the ability
to carry a movie without any big name male stars, the first to ever be
nominated for an action lead in “Aliens” two years earlier. She would become a double
nominee in 1989 for her work here and as Dian Fossey in “Gorillas in the Mist”.
In this movie, she kind of resembles her “Aliens” nemesis.
I always felt that Griffith
was the weak point in this movie. She’s too soft-spoken, too vulnerable. It’s good
to see a portrayal of a powerful woman who isn’t a bitch, but I wanted her to
speak up a little. Sure, she’s got a nice smile, but she doesn’t exude any real
gumption, and that’s what this role needed. That gumption, I suppose, is why
Weaver and Cusack still have strong film careers, and I haven’t seen Griffith
in anything for quite some time.
No comments:
Post a Comment