NR, 4 min.
Director/Writer: Robert Loebel
I think there’s an
interesting critical phenomenon that happens when people stray away from the
typical format of anything. Everybody becomes more forgiving. We watch feature
length films in general. We judge our movies on how 90 to 150 minutes can be
filled. When we start looking at different lengths, especially when those
lengths are as short as 3 or 4 minutes, we think everything is great.
“Wind” isn’t a bad movie.
It’s good at achieving what it wants. It’s clever. But then, that’s where I get
stuck. It’s clever. A lot of things are clever. It’s not that hard to be
clever. Should a 3½ minute short be more than just clever. With only 3½ minutes
I suppose that should be enough, but I’ve seen much more accomplished in that
space of time with movies just as short, one even shorter.
“Wind” tells the story….
Well, no. It shows us a world with inhabitants that exist in a perpetually
windy environment. People at a bar pour their drinks to the side, using the
wind to carry the liquid from one receptacle to another. Mothers tie their
babies to stakes in the ground, reeling them out like kites to cruise in the
wind. Longhaired men line up at a barber’s who simply cuts the hair flying out
behind them. All of these things are clever, but they don’t really tell a
story.
Robert Loebel’s minimalistic
animation is well executed. There’s a distinct use of space. The hand drawn
style is somewhat crude, almost childish, which I suppose fits the material. At
the end of the movie we follow a large man under the surface. He relieves an
old man from a crank. When the old man stops cranking, all the wind stops. When
the young man starts cranking again the wind returns. It’s something I’ve seen
before in another form somewhere. Again, it’s clever. I’m not so sure it’s
profound.
No comments:
Post a Comment