R, 98 min.
Director: David Wain
Writers: David Wain, Ken
Marino
Starring: Jennifer Aniston,
Paul Rudd, Justin Theroux, Malin Akerman, Alan Alda, Ken Marino, Joe Lo
Truglio, Kathryn Hahn, Kerri Kenney-Silver, Lauren Ambrose, Michaela Watkins,
Jordan Peele, Linda Lavin
I often hear about the poor
choices Jennifer Aniston makes for movie roles. It’s true. She’s a gifted
actress who can’t choose a worthwhile project to star in to save her soul. I
think this might be a reflection of sexism in Hollywood, however. Not because
she doesn’t get the chance to play good roles. She’s powerful enough to command
her own career choices. But, how come no one is criticizing the equally
talented Paul Rudd for the poor choices he makes in picking projects a good
deal of the time?
Don’t get me wrong. I love
Paul Rudd, and you’ve got a better shot of hitting a good one with his
filmography than you do with Aniston’s. However, he’s been in some clunkers,
and this one is his lost puppy. In fact, Rudd and Aniston have hit a low like
this together before in Nicholas Hytner’s ill conceived “The Object of My
Affection”, a rom com that decided it would be a good idea to have the pregnant
Aniston fall in love with the gay Rudd. I really don’t know where they thought
they were going to get with that one. With “Wanderlust” the prospects are
better, but the end result still isn’t any good.
Rudd is actually the best
thing about this movie. He’s just about the only element the filmmakers get
right. He’s perfect as a New Yorker down on his luck who decides he and his
wife should try out commune life once he looses his job. Aniston is not right
for his wife. I buy her as the New Yorker, but not as the hippie she becomes.
This role needed someone a little more like Kristen Wiig, who can pull off both
the uptight New Yorker and the newly reformed bohemian.
2 comments:
We bought this movie on Apple TV. Nothing really awesome about the film. I don't know why but I always see the personality of "Rachel" (Friends) in Jennifer Aniston whatever movie she makes. :)
Aniston is an actor type that doesn't specialize in presenting different characters. This is not a criticism and is not a reflection of her talent. Beauty often has trouble being presented in any other way than they might naturally come across to other people. Plus the industry makes it very hard for these types of actors to break away from their character type. I think she did a very good job of shedding the "Rachel" image in last year's comedy Horrible Bosses.
Post a Comment