Director: David Fincher
Writers: David Giler, Walter
Hill, Larry Ferguson, Vincent Ward, Dan O’Bannon (characters), Ronald Shusett
(characters)
Starring: Sigourney Weaver,
Charles S. Dutton, Charles Dance, Paul McGann, Brian Glover, Ralph Brown, Danny
Webb, Christopher John Fields, Holt McCallany, Lance Henricksen
Many were disappointed with
the third film in the “Alien” series, with good reason. When I originally saw
it in theaters, I enjoyed it; but it didn’t have the substance behind it
established by its predecessors. The mother and company themes were sprinkled
into its plot, but hardly featured heavily into its execution, which was more
concerned with creating a situation where a limited number of people without
any weapons were trapped to be hunted down by a new type of alien. That alone
made for an exciting movie, but it wasn’t something amazing.
More interesting was the
behind the scenes story of “Alien 3”. The movie went through several directors
in its concept stage. Taking a queue from James Cameron, it was decided early
on not to simply repeat the same characters and situations of it predecessors.
However, when Fox finally settled on first time director David Fincher, it may have
been a power play to control the content of the movie. Fincher had great
success directing music videos, would go on to make Oscar-winning movies, and
even make successful movies for Fox again. But, as a first time director, he
held little power over his movie. It’s said he even tried to get his name
removed from the cut of the film that was eventually released in theaters.
Thanks to the DVD
revolution, however, director’s cuts became a new market for movies. Fox was
gracious enough to realize the mistake they had made when it came time for a
DVD release in 2003. They asked Fincher to come back and assemble a director’s
cut for them, but since they hadn’t even allowed him to film many of the scenes
he’d planned, he declined due to the impossibility of getting his original
vision on screen. Fox decided to do the next best thing and restored Fincher’s
first assembly cut. The fact that the assembly cut is so much better than the
theatrical cut shows just how good this movie would’ve been had Fincher been
allowed to produce his vision for the film.
Almost entirely removed from
the theatrical cut was the new element that Fincher introduced to the series,
the religious angle. The Christ imagery of Ripley in the film’s final moments
is impossible to miss, even in the theatrical cut; but the original script had
religious allegory and references throughout. The movie is filled with lessons
of sacrifice and temptation. The all-male prison colony that becomes infected
by both an alien and a female includes some Genesis symbolism. And, the
introduction of the human Bishop, architect of the Bishop android played by
Lance Henricksen in “Aliens”, has some not very subtle suggestions about
creation and how we are supposedly made in God’s image.
2 comments:
i really always liked this movie, even the version i saw in the theater (back when i saw movies in theaters). i'm stoked to check out the "director's" cut now.
thanks man!
I'm glad I could steer you to something, man. I liked it in theaters too. I saw it on a huge screen the first time and those chase sequences from the alien's POV were really intense. After that I dragged Russell to it. Then I became aware of the negative backlash against it and began noticing its weaknesses. I still like the theatrical cut, but the special edition adds some interesting elements. The alien's life cycle is given more consideration in the longer version and it turns out that it wasn't birthed from a dog (that was one of Fox's reshoots) but came from a steer. That sequence in much better in the SE. There's a rather fascinating doc on its production woes in the Alien Quadrilogy box set. I don't know if it's included on the new Alien Anthology box set.
Post a Comment